Acquisition or investment
A buyer or investor needs to understand sustainable earnings, cash, debt and financial risks.
Purpose-defined valuation and financial due diligence for acquisitions, disposals, investments, shareholder decisions and strategic planning—with assumptions and evidence kept visible.
Choose the service when value or transaction risk must be supported by financial analysis rather than a headline multiple or untested forecast.
A buyer or investor needs to understand sustainable earnings, cash, debt and financial risks.
Owners need a defensible value narrative and clarity on issues likely to affect negotiations.
A transaction, reorganisation, buyout or succession step requires a defined valuation basis.
Management needs to understand the drivers that create or erode enterprise value.
The scope begins with the purpose, decision standard and access level, then focuses analysis on the factors most likely to affect value or transaction terms.
Confirm the decision, valuation date, standard, transaction context, access and materiality.
Review historical results, balance sheet, cash flows, forecasts, customer data and transaction records.
Apply appropriate methods or diligence procedures and test material assumptions and sensitivities.
Present findings, limitations, sensitivities and matters affecting negotiation or next steps.
The exact deliverable depends on whether the engagement is a valuation, full financial diligence or a focused red-flag review.
Adjustments and recurring/non-recurring factors affecting maintainable performance.
Financial positions and trends relevant to enterprise-to-equity value or transaction terms.
Methods, assumptions, findings, sensitivities, limitations and identified transaction issues.
Priority questions, information gaps and matters for price, protections or completion planning.
A valuation estimates value under defined assumptions and methods. Due diligence investigates information and risks for a decision. A transaction may require both, but the procedures and outputs should remain clear.
Methods and assumptions selected for the purpose, business and available evidence.
Quality of earnings, cash, debt, working capital, controls and other agreed areas.
Issues can affect price, adjustments, protections, conditions or integration planning.
Access restrictions, reliance, assumptions and excluded work remain explicit.
We tailor the final request list after an initial discussion. These records normally provide the starting point.
The final scope depends on the entity, operating model, records, authority requirements and the facts confirmed during onboarding.
The method depends on purpose, business model, maturity, forecast reliability and market evidence. More than one method may be considered.
It is a focused investigation of historical and current financial information, earnings, cash, debt, working capital and agreed risks for a transaction decision.
A high-level range may be possible with limited information, but its purpose, assumptions and limitations must be clearly stated.
Findings can be translated into decision questions and financial issues for price or terms, while legal drafting remains with counsel.
Yes. Key drivers, assumptions, sensitivities and reconciliation to historical performance can be assessed within the agreed scope.
Each page has a defined scope. Select the current service or move to another service when the business need changes.
Tell us the transaction, purpose, deadline and information available. We will propose the analysis that the decision actually requires.