External comparable support is needed
The business has no reliable internal uncontrolled transaction against which to test the controlled arrangement.
A benchmarking study tests an identified transaction using reliable internal or external comparables. We document the method, search strategy, screening decisions, adjustments and result so the conclusion can be followed and used in the wider Transfer Pricing file.
Use benchmarking after the transaction and pricing method are sufficiently clear. A database result cannot repair an incorrectly delineated arrangement.
The business has no reliable internal uncontrolled transaction against which to test the controlled arrangement.
The covered period, comparable companies, financial data or business conditions no longer support current use.
Finance needs to compare the recorded margin, price or rate to an identified arm's-length result before filing.
The formal document requires a transaction-specific method, tested-party selection and comparable evidence.
Every material screen and judgement is documented. The objective is a defensible comparable set—not the largest list or a predetermined range.
Confirm the accurately delineated transaction, method, tested party, profit-level indicator or pricing variable, period and geographic scope.
Review potential internal comparables first, then define the external database search where reliable internal evidence is unavailable.
Apply documented quantitative and qualitative criteria, examine business descriptions and financial information, and record rejection reasons.
Compute the result, consider reliable adjustments, test the controlled outcome and explain how the conclusion should be applied.
The report shows both the final result and the route taken to reach it, allowing management, auditors and the wider file preparer to follow the analysis.
The economic question, selected method, tested party or price variable, and why the available data is reliable.
Database, geography, industry codes, keywords, financial filters, period and other search parameters.
Accepted companies or transactions, rejection reasons, qualitative review and source references.
Calculations, statistical range where appropriate, adjustments, tested outcome and implementation observations.
The FTA guide recognises five standard Transfer Pricing methods and allows another method where the recognised methods cannot reasonably be applied. The most appropriate method depends on the transaction, functions and reliable information available.
Federal Tax Authority — Transfer Pricing Guide (CTGTP1)A reliable uncontrolled transaction involving the tested business can be more direct than an external database search.
The selection should reflect functional complexity and the quality of available segmented data.
Business activities, markets, functions, assets and risks matter beyond an industry code.
Financial data and multi-year information are used only where they improve reliability for the transaction and period.
A reliable benchmark begins with a reliable transaction analysis and tested financial information.
These answers explain the service boundary. The final treatment and engagement plan depend on the entity, period, records and current UAE requirements.
No. The evidence depends on the selected method and available reliable information. Some transactions may be supported by internal comparables or other direct evidence.
Possibly, but only after assessing transaction, market, geographic, accounting and data differences. It should not be copied into the UAE file without that review.
It is the result of the accepted comparable data and calculation method. The study explains the range and how the tested transaction compares with it.
That depends on changes in the transaction, market and comparable set, plus the period for which the data is being used. We state the recommended review approach in the report.
Yes, where the policy and accounts permit. We show how the tested result relates to the recorded outcome; the accounting and legal implementation is then confirmed with the business.
Each page has its own defined purpose. Use the current service for the work described here, or choose another service when the business need changes.
Send the transaction type, tested entity, period and any existing functional analysis so we can define the study scope.